RUS citing western sources, to me, adds an odd sense of objectivity to the article, even though I agree about employing the logical fallacy. I know why they’re doing it, but yet still seeing it even acknowledged on the same page is something our “free” press no longer does. You used to be able to find both sides of an argument within the same print… back when it was printed every morning.
PS- This is a really, really great assessment. I hate to be redundant like that but I can’t believe I can read such a level of analysis out in the wild. Cheers to you, good Sir!
RUS citing western sources, to me, adds an odd sense of objectivity to the article, even though I agree about employing the logical fallacy. I know why they’re doing it, but yet still seeing it even acknowledged on the same page is something our “free” press no longer does. You used to be able to find both sides of an argument within the same print… back when it was printed every morning.
PS- This is a really, really great assessment. I hate to be redundant like that but I can’t believe I can read such a level of analysis out in the wild. Cheers to you, good Sir!
I’m troubled after reading this. I’m not sure how the West counters this without some significant changes in how we approach the media…
Sounds a lot like checkmate